Guys, my post (in this topic) seems to be neglected.
if plain members (not staff) should not be able to send PMs at all ... then my idea works (I tried it ). But If plain users should be allowed to reply to PMs by forum staff, then it's not foolproof (editing the receiver should then be blocked).
However, if sending mails or instant message are allowed, then the whole PM system can be bypassed.
So I suggest that the exact requirements are specified in order to avoid (or at least reduce) entering paths leading to a dead end.
if plain members (not staff) should not be able to send PMs at all ... then my idea works (I tried it ). But If plain users should be allowed to reply to PMs by forum staff, then it's not foolproof (editing the receiver should then be blocked).
However, if sending mails or instant message are allowed, then the whole PM system can be bypassed.
So I suggest that the exact requirements are specified in order to avoid (or at least reduce) entering paths leading to a dead end.
Statistics: Posted by warmweer — Thu Nov 21, 2024 8:55 am